Epoch's work is free to use, distribute, and reproduce provided the source and authors are credited under the Creative Commons BY license.
Learn more about this graph
This data insight is based on our AI use in research explorer. We use GPT-5.6 Sol to check every preprint on bioRxiv from January 2020 until September 2026 for acknowledgments of AI use, counting LLM use and specialized AI tool use separately. The OpenAI Decisions API, based on GPT-6 Luna, further classifies LLM use acknowledgments into four use-case categories: research, code and computation, writing, and literature review. Research use includes conceptual contributions such as experimental design, methodological contributions such as data labeling, and analysis, such as statistical analysis. See the full methodology for more information.
Assumptions and limitations
- We measure voluntary AI acknowledgments, which reflect both AI usage and disclosure norms. Our figures may underestimate true AI usage.
- We look at AI use acknowledgments in biology preprints. Preprints may not be representative of peer-reviewed papers.
- AI use acknowledgments and LLM use case classifications are performed by AI models and are therefore subject to error.
- We compiled a list of 150 specialized AI tools by sampling recent preprints on bioRxiv and scanning for mentions of AI tools. This may not be a complete set of specialized AI tools used in biology research.
See the limitations section of the full methodology for more details.
Download this data
Explore this data
Our estimates of the share of papers acknowledging large language model use in physics, biology, statistics, and math.

